07/13/2024
Narcissistic POS!!! 🤬🤬🤬
📽️: https://youtu.be/QFdsOFzfBEY An armed suspect approaches the security detail for Justice Sonia Sotomayor near the Supreme Court Justice’s residence. Shots are fired, and the suspect is apprehended.
Armed guards protect Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, although she consistently dissents against 2A rulings like in McDonald v. Chicago (2010), rejecting “a private right of armed self-defense.”
In the case, Justices Breyer/Ginsberg/Sotomayor contended, “I can find nothing in the Second Amendment’s text, history, or underlying rationale that could warrant characterizing it as ‘fundamental’ insofar as it seeks to protect the keeping and bearing of arms for private self-defense purposes.”
Later in the dissent, after criticizing a prior SCOTUS decision — District of Columbia. v. Heller (2008) — Breyer/Ginsberg/Sotomayor stressed, “Further, there is no popular consensus that the private self-defense right described in Heller is fundamental.”
In the early portion of the dissent’s conclusion, Breyer/Ginsberg/Sotomayor claimed, “In sum, the Framers did not write the Second Amendment in order to protect a private right of armed self-defense. There has been, and is, no consensus that the right is, or was, ‘fundamental.’”
Justice Sotomayor's rulings impact everyday citizens' rights to self-defense, yet her armed security detail shows the stark reality of "rules for thee, but not for me" by the elites making the rules!
Let me know your thoughts in the comments:
Also, Click HERE for my favorite in-ear totally wireless hearing protection That has 6x hearing enhancement, 10 hours of use, and they're easy to use:
➡️ https://bit.ly/3wnUOPf
Also, our I Am the Militia designs are back in stock, click here:
➡️ http://bit.ly/2nAD7sF
New 40oz 2A Tumblers, 2A Designs, Vacuum Insulated, With Handle & Straw
➡️ https://bit.ly/3w0RzNC
📲 Subscribe to Here: http://bit.ly/3OTkrgB