29/02/2020
In Scandinavia, the Battle axe rose in popularity during the Viking Age (c. 800–1100 AD), when the axe became the battle weapon of choice. During this time, improvements in iron smelting techniques allowed the Nordic smiths to develop axes with longer handles and thinner blades, making it lighter and stronger for use in battle.
This type of axe was wielded by foot soldiers at the Battle of Hastings in 1066, as documented in the Bayeux tapestry (shown above). The picture of the axe heads and chainmail displayed on the table were actual axes and armor used during the pivotal Battle of Hastings.
During the Middle Ages and Renaissance (around the 11th–16th centuries), European armies often had two different types of battle axe: a small axe with a short handle that was carried on the belt, and a larger axe with a long handle. The knights often fought on foot, in fierce hand to hand combat with battle axes and swords. A battle axe design favored by knights had an iron spike on the handle end that could be used for punching through bone and armor. During the 15th century, knights in Germany and France in particular used special battle axes that were intended to crush the opponent’s metal armor. These axes were heavier, with a shorter handle and a dull edge that wouldn’t chip or bend when striking metal.
In Central Europe, throwing axes made entirely of iron were used in the late Middle Ages. The handle was usually 25–30 centimeters (about 10 to 12 inches long) and ended in a point. The butt also had a sharp spike and the cutting edge was around 16 (about 6 inches) centimeters long.
(Fun fact) The primary reason axes became extremely popular in battle is simply economics. Axe heads could be efficiently made from iron, rather than hard to produce steel for a sword. If the axe handle broke, it could easily be replaced and used again and again.
(Question for thought) Would you rather be armed with an axe or a sword? An axe can crush plate armor, but a sword is more agile and quick.